SES London 2011 – Local 2.0: The Evolution of Local Search

These is a summary of the seminar from SES London 2011 on factors effecting local search.

Presenter: Lisa Myers, CEO, Verve Search

Main factors effecting local search results:

  1. Location: Proximity of your location to the search query, hence if Hotel is located closer to where Google thinks is the centre of city it will have better ranking
  2. Relevance: internal factors – business name (keywords not too important any more) & category associated with in business centre (business places). Use at list 1 default category, location keyword in category not that important. Do not use custom categories where possible, as they can look spammy and result in penalties
  3. Prominence: external factors – reviews, data available and occurrences of user generated content i.e. MyMaps.  Most powerful off-page is web citations, putting value back into local directories. Make sure all is consistent. Get competitive analysis done by going to competitors ages clicking on link “more from around the web” to see their citation. User reviews important in travel but impact varies in other industries. Still not sure if Google tweaked the algorism enough to identify Quality Vs Quantity. But it is still important factor for conversion. For now Quantity is important while Google develops sentiment analysis. Another emerging factor would be Review Velocity, referring to consistency of review accumulation. UGC not only reviews, but also images and videos, again volume counts.
  4. Coupons use on Google places can give your listing a boost
  5. Make use of paid Tags to promote.
  6. Remember about Google HotPot – integration of your friends social review into the results – Search going Social.
Posted in Search Engine Marketing Digest | Leave a comment

Future of Google Search for 2011


Presented by Finlay Clark,  Industry Manager – Agency at Google.

It Is All About Context

People start to search as they think rather than restricting to keyword or phrase with 1/3 of all searching being unique in 2010. Hence finding result by exact phrase is not providing the best and most relevant result to the searcher. Google is going forward with more semantic approach providing results by context relevance rather than exact phrase match. For SEO it means more work on the theme of keywords in the content rather than repetition of one main keyword.

Get Results from Your Social Network

Google sees future in social results and probably will expand on currently available feature of social results. Google lets you see relevant comments of your network in the search results when you are logged in and have Google Buzz. Making results not only more aware of social content but also making them more personal to you as an individual.

More Translations – More Results

Google results’ page options on left side bar allows for all results to be translated from foreign language. Thus providing more options to user, but does it mean that searches without location relevance will be more universal and Geo-targeted SEO is out of fashion?
See this option under drop down in “More search tools”

Why Local is in Main Results Area

Now we have some answer on why Google inserted local results into main part of results page. Smart phone users search 50% more than people without smart phone. Hence local results moved to main part to encourage mobile search by users without smart phones.

Google New ads formats

  • Google image results will have new formats with image and text on top of the results .
  • Connecting Google Adwords to Google merchant will allow star rating in the results, but Google does not show any rating if it is below 4 stars
  • Other merchant features moving into main results would be coupons, with estimates of 300m mobile coupon users by 2014
  • Call back request buttons with information on the approximate time of response is one of the features which will boost further local ads.
Posted in Google Features | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Search Engine Marketing Readers Digest 18/01/2011

Techniques to gain Any Links

Daily SEO Tip

  • Using testimonials on site: Include person’s photo, company & position; otherwise they are not doing any good. It’s a cynical world.
  • Use social to stalk your targeted link owner.
  • Use your media connection to impress your target link owner by mentioning them.
  • Or just write about your target and then email them with a hint to see if they are grateful enough or their ego is big enough to link to you.

Read the Full Article

Facebook Halts Pone & Address Sharing (For Now)

Mashable

Speculates that, best direction for Facebook share of phone & address with apps is to allow app preview. With quote of Facebook’s Douglas Purdy that phone and address sharing will be available to apps as soon as possible and delay will be minimum, so start getting your personal details changed Now!

Read the Full Article

I Can Haz $$$: Cheezburger Network Scores $30 Million in Funding

Mashable

Article reports on $30 million investment in the company whose aim is just to bring 5 min happiness a day to each and every one of us. Sounds crazy, but that something like Coke way of life, their aim was to be not farther then5 min walk from any single individual on earth. And Huh saying he is not after world domination, right…

Read the Full Article

Facebook’s Ad Revenue Hit $1.86B for 2010

Mashable

Article mainly report stats:

  • Advertising alone brought in 2010 – $1.86 billion, accounting for 5% of all online spend 2010. Serving more than 50 million ads a month.
  • Facebook overall goal was $2 billion, which thought have been achieved after adding other profits eg Facebook Credits. It is still not enough, Facebook experiments with Local Ads for new revenue source.

Read the Full Article

HTML5 Gets an Official Logo from W3C

Mashable

Report on new logo for HTML 5… great… is it just me or it looks like WW2 Soviet style posters of workers unite? Like the illustration from Washtech below:

Office logo html 5soviet style internet workers unite

Not very forward thinking, but maybe they went for feeling of equality?
Read the Full Article

Online retailers saw an increase in fraud last year

Econsultancy

Average fraudulent number of order 1.9%
Why increase in fraud?

  • 77% see increased sales and 59% expect no change to fraud budget
  • SME suffer more, less tools, less people, simpler checkout solutions, no separate role for fraud management
  • 5% of all transactions are rejected by anti-fraud measures, some of those orders are probably good, and lose customer for lifetime.
  • No single solution is good in isolation, need to have more layers hence the growing popularity of Verified by Visa (73% use this tool) and Mastercard SecureCode.
  • More retailers turn to international sales and see higher fraud from Ghana, Nigiria and US.

Read the Full Article

Five principles for online personalisation

Econsultancy

  • Clear goals and objectives
  • Right team
  • Simplicity – use as few software systems as possible
  • Make workflow: identify segment, identify opportunity, create rule, test, go live, analyse, tweak, repeat
  • Hence start small: returning customers and geography are a good starting point.

Read the Full Article

Google: Doubleclick Ad Exchange growing, boosting CPMs

Econsultancy

  • Google claims publishers generate 1885 more revenue through Ad Exchange then other third pary and indirect sales.
  • New Features coming up e.g. Private Ad Slots, invite only auction for exclusive space
  • 1000 biggest Google spenders spent 75% more on display in 2010, real-time bidding accounting for 56% of total.
  • The question still remains if all this new technology will deliver display that brings good ROI.

Read the Full Article

Research: Optimism Fueled SEM Growth in Q4, But ROI Lagged

Search Engine Land

That title does sound more what Trader will report on daily market overview before going into Bulls & Bears.
Stats from Efficient Frontier Report for Q4 in Search Engine Marketing:

  • YOY 23% growth in spend due to CPC increase (YOY 102% cpc growth Bing, 122% cpc growth Google)
  • ROI dropped 10%
  • Travel saw largest growth 42% 2nd Automotive 33%, 3rd Finance 30%
  • Spend went 79% to Google, 21% Yahoo&Bing
  • Future predictions 2011 YOY growth of spend by 15%

Read the Full Article

What To Do With Out-Of-Date Product Pages?

Search Engine Standard Magazine

549 word article stating:

Don’t leave your outdated page they frustrate users and you are not making use of al link juice.

Solution: 301 redirect to most relevant page, if you think product will be available in future, add paragraph on top of the page with alternatives and move old content below the fold.

Done.
Read the Full Article

How to Do SEO for Sites and Products with No Search Demand

SEOmoz

Problem: New product/service without enough exposure to generate traffic to site.
Offer Solutions by Rand Fish:

  • Create content around similar products or products that can be replaced by yours
  • Create content comparing your product alongside same category products for which your product offers alternative
  • Create related content that appeals to your target audience
  • Build Brand – by association through: viral, video, contests, celebrities.

Read the Full Article

P.S. This overview is a digest of main points from articles as per my interpretation, and can be not representative of articles’ authors intentions.

Posted in Search Engine Marketing Digest | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Consumer Online Shopping Gender Differences: Summary of Academic Studies

This article holds the summary of the relevant academic study, on the aspect of gender differences which affect online shopping behaviour. The main take-outs from academic studies below are as following:

  • Men were found to be more brand orientated, women novel-fashion decision makers. Solution: variation on presentation style of the product for men and women with novelty and brand features.
  • Women were more to make purchase if friend gave a recommendation, while men where not positively effected by it. Solution: Bring friends closer to the shop – e.g. Trip Advisor bringing in Facbook friends to their site.
  • Men’s probability of shopping online was only effected by amount of time they spent online, women had additional worries of loosing the money and lower computer usage confidence. Solution: Ensuring the monetary loss fear is reduced use of trusted secure signs throughout the site.
  • Knowledge of product category reduced anxiety of making purchase online in both genders. Solution: educational material distribution and on site e.g. guide to products features.
  • Women do see it as a shopping medium while men are more likely to see internet as pass-time. Solution: bring shopping to the mediums they use gaming and business niche collaboration on cross-selling and promotions

1. Yang and Wu (2007)

Yang and Wu (2007) findings suggested that men and women differ in their decision-making styles. Their main findings were that women are novel-fashion orientated while shopping online, and men are more brand orientated in this medium.

2. Garbarino and Strahilevitz (2004)

Garbarino and Strahilevitz (2004) research found that women are positively affected by friend recommendation, while for men it did not have an effect. The interesting finding was that although women were less likely to purchase online than men without recommendation, when recommendation was given they were more likely to make a purchase then men did.

3. Yang and Lester (2005)

Yang and Lester (2005) found that women are affected by more factors than men, in the decision to purchase online. They were affected by the attitude towered money, computer anxiety levels and amount of time spent online. While time spent online was the only variable affecting man, although it was not the predictor of their behavior towards using Internet for shopping. That made Yang and Lester draw a conclusion that factors affecting men in online shopping have not yet been identified.

4. Dholakia and Chiang (2003)

Dholakia and Chiang (2003) were looking on gender stereotypes in online shopping; their findings showed that expensive, new technical products are associated with men being products’ buyers, while less technical staff was still associated with female shopper. Other factors like: shop type or reason; did not play any role in gender stereotype.

5. Hui and Wan (2007)

Hui and Wan (2007) found that internet shopping is perceived mainly as a convenience medium by all sample. No differences have been found between genders regarding the Internet security concerns. They also identified that inability to have physical shopping experience had major affect on women, Internet was dissatisfying in this matter for them. This factor did not affect higher educated respondents; their guess is that those respondents had better understanding of product category and their needs, so they were confident with their purchase without prior product inspection.

6. Heimrath and Goulding (2001)

Heimrath and Goulding (2001) study showed the differences of association men and women have towards Internet. Women mention shopping, banking and information search as uses for Internet, while male are more technology orientated, mention gaming, computer software updates, professional awareness, and business.

7. Goldsmith and Flynn (2004)

Goldsmith and Flynn (2004) research of online shopping is based on clothing market. Their findings did not find any gender differences. According to their research better predictors of online purchase will be customers’ innovativeness and prior experience with in-home shopping, i.e. catalogues.

Posted in Online Shopping | Leave a comment

Google Results Gets New Feature: Google Instant Preview

We just getting over the new Google Local results and still figuring out how to make the most of it and Google strikes again.

Google Instant was rolled out to help users find things even faster, hence not surprising the new feature has the same goal. Now you can use Google Instant Preview to see the snapshot of the page without leaving Google.

According to Google such preview increases satisfaction with click-through by 5%, not much, so some do say this update will not see the full roll out, but maybe Google wants us to change our behaviour and stop franticly clicking on results to open in new tabs and bounce from most of them within a few seconds. Such update can mean lower traffic to your site but also for lucky ones (ie hard working and understanding the purpose of site) people it can mean traffic with lower bounce rate.

How is this going to impact Online Marketing?

1. The previews do not show flash (at list in this version).
2. Previews highlight the text that matches the description in the results, making it readable compared to rest of the text.
3. Previews are rather small screen shots, putting clattered sites into disadvantage.
4. The previews on opening will overlay the side PPC Ads.

Implications:

a. Flash

Another great point for you to argue against Flash on companies site.

b. Layout

This will definitely favour clean “single point” layouts with maybe one big header, block of text and most probably two/one column layouts will have advantage.

c. Meta Description

Now you will have to consider and test if your site will perform better without having “meta description” in order to have that extra highlighted text in the preview (see example image below) or you can still strongly believe that people will trust your meta to click through without seeing it reflected in the preview.

d. PPC

Even harder competition in PPC for the top spots as left side will be covered on the preview. Giving more power to the organic results.

But, have to remember that:

  • You actually have to click on one of the icons in order to enable the previews of all the sites.
  • Web-master can opt out of participation
  • Maybe it will be as per Instant Search available to those who are logged in and will not impact as much
  • We don’t know which version results are being used, how old the cache and how fast it will renew the snapshot.

Big thanks to @RobBothan on help with this article.





Play around with new feature, before it rolled out on Google.


Posted in Google Features | Leave a comment

Online Shopping Academic Introduction of Consumer Prospective

Online shopping or electronic commerce is use of computer technology to carry out business transaction automatically, allowing for sales of products and services 24/7 (Yang and Lester, 2005).

Internet shopping main feature is the ability to shop from the comfort of your home. Other varieties of home shopping have been available before, for example, paper catalogue shopping has been around for more the 100 years (Goldsmith and Flynn, 2004). Other ways of in-home shopping include things like videotext and shopping television channels/programs or door to door salespeople. Nevertheless, according to Goldsmith and Flynn (2004) none had the impact of still developing and growing online shopping.

Another worth of the Internet to the consumer is the enabling of the information search and the ease of comparison of different products and prices. Shopping online is more attractive due to these features as they can find more information about the products, different pricings and availability of it (Brown et al., 2003). Researchers found that shoppers firstly will find information then make a purchase (Yang and Lester, 2005). But the question is: Would they make purchase online?

Online Shopping: Positive Aspects

Research showed that several positive aspects perceived by consumers in online shopping can be subdivided into time related, information related, convenience, price and sales people sections below.

a) TIME

With the invention of the Internet it became possible to communicate, search information, work, and shop 24 hours 7 days a week. And increasing time shortage pushes people to leave the conventional shopping and directs their attention to Internet shopping (Yang and Wu, 2007). It allows doing all types of shopping at any time and from any place which has computer and internet connection. It saves time as not only you can do shopping when you have time and not when shops are open, but as well the shopping is delivered to your door, so there is no need to physically got to the shops.

b) INFORMATION

Information search is the main use of Internet by most customers, and internet users are perceived to be well informed customers (Molesworth and Suortti, 2002). It allows to quickly finding out information about products without leaving home (Hui and Wan, 2007). Internet intermediaries such as comparison websites allow for fast, easy search for relevant products and their comparison from different retailers, which can be located both online and offline.

c) CONVENIENCE

Internet shopping is perceived to be a convenient medium for shopping. Hui and Wan (2007) summaries literature on convenience of Internet and according to them, Internet shopping perceived to be convenient, because of: it availability 24/7; the amount of time it saves on physical visits to the shops; reduction on effort to visit shops; comfort of own home; comfort of speed depending on each individual preference. Hui and Wan (2007) argue that this convenience of Internet is making customers less conscious of the price.

Burt and Sparks (2003) cited in Hui and Wan (2007) give an example of software purchase over the Internet, there is no need even to wait for its delivery, as it can be downloaded in the matter of minutes from the Internet and there is possible trial period when person can use software without paying for it upfront.

d) PRICE

Molesworth and Suortti (2002) put forward suggestion that customers are expecting for online price for the product to be lower than offline. According to Hui and Wan (2007) price should be lower, as mentioned in Section on Internet effect on Business, there are less physical shops and less labor which should lead to overall cost reductions. On the other hand findings of Donthus and Garcia (1998) cited in Hui and Wan (2007) suggest that online shoppers are not price orientated because they have higher disposable income. This is also supported by the argument from the above Convenience section.

e) SALES PEOPLE

On the positive side, for some product categories where there is a possibility to be pressured into agreement from sales team, customers are more likely to adopt internet for pressure free environment (Molesworth and Suortti, 2002).

f) VIRTUAL SELF

Internet allows for disembodied communication. In its space people are creating their own self without any restriction from the way they look, their age, or gender (Kacen, 2000). This allows customers to brows and purchase things they want or fantasize about, without being limited by stereotypes or being afraid to be seen in certain shops.

Negative Aspects

The negative features of the Internet shopping are presented below under sections: security, trust, physical, human-interaction, and delivery.

a) SECURITY

There was a boom of online companies, when internet started growing fast, but many have failed leaving customers with perception of low security on Internet (Hui and Wan, 2007). Though, customers are still making the purchases over Internet. The main risk perceived by internet customers is security risk that their financial and personal information is going to be intercepted by third party and used to get money from their accounts (Bush et al., 1998, cited in Hui and Wan, 2007).

b) TRUST

The most repeatedly mentioned reason for not shopping on the Internet is trust (Perea y Monsuwe et al., 2004). As internet requires personal information before the purchase, it makes consumers uncertain and the more uncertainty the more trust a customer should have in the online retailer (Gronroos, 1994; cited in Fam et al., 2004). According to Hui and Wan (2007) when consumer will start trusting a particular online retailer, they will make repeat purchases with them.

c) PHYSICAL

The problem of trust towards online retailer is intensified with absence of salesperson and inability to touch product before buying it (Lynchet et al., 2001; Riechheld and Schefter, 2000; cited in Harris and Goode, 2004). These also is confirmed by Teo (2002) cited in Hui and Wan (2007) where the research showed inability to examine products as main downfall of Internet shopping. In addition it becomes the main problem in high involvement purchases (Hoffman and Novak, 1996; cited in Downie, 2006).

d) HUMAN-INTERACTION

Although, absence of salesperson can be seen by some as advantage (see Section 2.3.1 e) Sales People), Perea y Monsuwe et al., (2004) suggest that sales people act as reassurance in offline retailing as perceived to an expert with ability to give required advise to the customers. Internet does not have salespeople and customers can feel unsure of their choice of the product (Molesworth and Suortti, 2002).

e) DELIVERY

Manly it is the concern of waiting to receive the purchased product. As well the worry for the product being received faulty or broken can raise and anxiety. If customer will need for some reason to return the product it can involve the cost of sending it back, as not all companies are prepared to pay for return items. In Molesworth and Suortti (2002) research delivery issue has been raised as well, where customers feel that delivery time is unsuitable and the forms required to fill in are to complex.

P.S.

I know the quotes are a bit outdated but they are still appropriate to the perception of online shopping. I am planning further to discuss the negative aspects and how to minimise such barrier to online shopping on the websites in order to increase the conversion.

If you would like detailed information about the references contact me on tatiana-l[at]london.com or on twitter tatiana_london.

Posted in Online Shopping | Leave a comment